Who we help
Adamant Code works with two groups: established businesses of roughly 20 to 300 people whose systems, reports or documents slow the work down, and domain-expert founders who understand a problem well and can fund a useful first release. We work with clients in the US, Canada, the UK, the EU and Australia.
Established businesses
Owners, operations leaders and managers who live with the problem every week. Each situation below shows what it usually looks like, what we build first and the closest public evidence.
The same customer, order or job is typed into two or three tools, and someone reconciles the differences at month end.
What we usually build first
An integration or workflow that moves the data once, checks it and flags the records that don't match.
A repeat client's platform supporting 44 internal users, 400+ connected properties and around 220k rows a day on average. These are scale figures, not measured savings.
A manager exports from several systems into a spreadsheet every week or month, and the figures get questioned when they arrive.
What we usually build first
A report built from the source systems, with checks that show where each figure came from.
Our guide shows how to put a yearly cost on the report before deciding what to automate.
Engineers, estimators or support staff search large document sets by hand, and answers depend on who remembers where things are.
What we usually build first
Search over your own documents that answers with citations, page references and the exact paragraph, so people can check the source.
Source-cited AI search for TCE, an infrastructure company, across bid packages that can reach 5,000 to 50,000 pages. Estimated 83% document-search time reduction, based on engineer interviews and client estimates, not usage-log measurement or audited financial savings.
Requests come in through website chat, an app and email, and it isn't clear who answers what or when a person should step in.
What we usually build first
Connected support inboxes with answers grounded in approved knowledge and clear rules for handing a conversation to a person.
Built around Chatwoot. Over five months the support platform managed 11,782 conversations across seven inboxes, and website chat had a typical first response of 36 seconds. The volume is a platform total, not a count of conversations resolved by AI, and the response time applies to website chat only.
A workbook or a generic tool holds a process it was never designed for, and the workarounds have their own instructions.
What we usually build first
An internal tool or customer portal built around your business rules, starting with the workflow the workaround exists for.
Seven signs, four things that are not signs, and a four-week test to run before you commit.
Each change takes longer than the last, releases break unrelated features, or the people who built it have moved on.
What we usually build first
An assessment of what to keep, fix or rebuild, then improvements in phases while the system keeps running.
An assessment worksheet for deciding what to keep, improve or replace.
Domain-expert founders
You bring knowledge of a real problem, funding for a useful first phase and access to prospective users. We bring product decisions, design and engineering in one team.
You can describe the users and the job the product does for them, and you need product decisions, design and engineering from one team.
What we usually build first
A first release scoped around one complete user journey, designed, built and released, then improved with feedback from real users.
A founder's rough wireframes became an AI-assisted marketplace with 50+ screens, 15+ workflows and a six-step invention workflow. These figures describe delivery scope, not revenue or adoption.
Your expertise lives in how you work with clients, and the product has to follow that method rather than a generic template.
What we usually build first
A product that follows the method's steps and rules, with the guardrails the subject needs.
TNM's coaching methodology translated into a multilingual text-and-voice product with memory, accountability, HR reporting and guardrails, across around 18 months and two major versions.
A prototype works in a demo, but real users, real data or a second customer expose gaps.
What we usually build first
A review of what to keep, then a small usable release to a limited group before a wider launch.
Our guide to moving an early product to a small, usable alpha.
Size and stage
Company size describes who we usually work with. It isn't a minimum.
| You are | Typical first step | A good fit when |
|---|---|---|
| An established business of roughly 20 to 300 people | One workflow: an integration, a report, a document search or an internal tool | The problem has a cost you can describe, the people who will use the result are available, and someone can make decisions. |
| A business with fewer than 20 people | The same, when the problem is concrete | Headcount alone doesn't rule it out. A concrete workflow problem and funding for the work matter more. |
| A domain-expert founder | A first release around one complete user journey | You can fund a useful first phase now and reach prospective users. Current revenue, outside investment and an AI feature aren't required. |
| A founder whose first phase depends on a raise that hasn't happened | Usually not yet | The first phase needs funding that is available now. |
Honest limits
Saying this up front saves both sides a call.
How work starts
You don't need a specification. Bring the workflow, the people it affects and examples of where it breaks down.
The weekly terms are on our terms page.
Mostly established businesses of roughly 20 to 300 people. A smaller business isn't automatically a poor fit. What matters is a concrete workflow problem, the people who will use the result and funding for the work.
Yes, with domain-expert founders who understand a problem well, can fund a useful first phase now and can reach prospective users. Current revenue, outside investment and an AI feature aren't required.
No. AI is optional and used only where it solves a practical problem. Many projects are integrations, internal tools or reporting.
Usually, if the required systems provide suitable APIs, exports, database access, or other approved integration paths. We confirm the available data and actions before defining the scope.
Clients in the US, Canada, the UK, the EU and Australia. We are based in Rijeka, Croatia, hold a weekly update meeting with each client and chat with them day to day in our client portal.
We assess existing software and improve or rebuild the parts holding the operation back, as a project. We don't take on one-off maintenance of software we didn't build.
The intended users, the business priority, the funding available, the first useful outcome and the next step. You don't need a specification, just the workflow and where it breaks down.
Bring one manual process, disconnected workflow or software problem. We’ll discuss what needs to work differently, the constraints involved and a sensible next step.
Talk through your workflow